What you are after will never work with identity columns.
What you are after will never work with identity columns. They are designed to "give out" and forget, by-design so that they don't cause waits or deadlocks etc. The property allows IDENTITY columns to be used as a sequence within a highly transactional system with no delay or URL1 make sure that there are no gaps means that there is NO WAY to implement a 100-insert per second system because there would be a very long queue to figure out if the 1st insert was going to be rolled back. For the same reason, you normally do not want this behaviour, nor such a number sequence for a high volume table.
However, for very infrequent, single-process tables (such as invoice number by a single process monthly), it is acceptable to put a transaction around a MAX(number)+1 or similar query, e.g. Declare @next int update sequence_for_tbl set @next=next=next+1 .. use @next.
SQL Identity (autonumber) is Incremented Even with a Transaction Rollback.
Surely this is not a good idea if you are inserting a lot of data – Neil Knight Apr 4 at 10:42 Sorry, I already have changed my answer :) – demas Apr 4 at 10:42.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.