If you want a reliably good, fun game; a twitch-based shooter; high kill counts; customizable loadouts, perks, etc.; Nazi Zombies. Why play Halo: Reach? If you want a team based, skill based shooter; Grifball; customizable characters; a fully fleshed out map creator; a widely used private match system; fewer rage-quitters; higher satisfaction for a kill.
Which is better? Metacritic Scores: -Halo: Reach: 91 -CoD:BO (PS3): 88 -CoD:BO (360): 87 -CoD:BO (PC): 81 As a game, as in how it is built, graphics, story, etc., Halo: Reach prevails. However, the experience for both is about equal though.
Cod:black ops can suck my ****. It sucks reallly badly. Halo Reach is better for now.
Save money up for MW3. The MW's tend to do better in the COD franchise.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.