The Kyoto Protocol still went ahead without the USA’s participation. So why do we need Simpol?

If we are going to have international agreements that are going to have a really significant effect on the environmental problems they’re designed to solve, we’re not going to get them unless all nations implement them simultaneously. Hence the urgent need for Simpol! More.

A key reason why the Kyoto Protocol proceeded without the participation of the USA is because the present provisions of the treaty are so mild. As such, the loss of competitive advantage likely to be suffered by those nations proceeding with the Protocol is not likely to be significant compared to the United States. But were the provisions of the Protocol to require much more stringent emissions reductions - as would be needed if a really significant impact on global warming is to be achieved - you would soon find no major nation willing to go ahead unless all did likewise because the significant additional costs their industries would have to bear compared to those of nations not participating would not be economically sustainable: the competitive disadvantage would simply be too great.

So if we are going to have international agreements that are going to have a really significant effect on the environmental problems they're designed to solve, we're not going to get them unless all, ...

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.