Tommy Hanson finished 3rd for NL Rookie of The Year. Anyone think he should have won?

Admittedly, I thought that JA Happ should have had it, Chris Coghlan only hit 9 homers and drove in 43 runs, that is not impressive at all. He did hit 321 which was good, but come on, 9 homers and 43 runs driven in should not be the numbers won by the rookie of the year. JA Happ pitched in a really tough division in terms of their hitters and he had an ERA of 2.93 and 12 wins which was very impressive.

Tommy Hansen was great as well, with 2.89 ERA and 11 wins and 4 losses. However I felt that JA Happ was more of a impact for his team as the Phillies was able to win their division and go to the World Series.

Admittedly, I thought that JA Happ should have had it, Chris Coghlan only hit 9 homers and drove in 43 runs, that is not impressive at all. He did hit 321 which was good, but come on, 9 homers and 43 runs driven in should not be the numbers won by the rookie of the year. JA Happ pitched in a really tough division in terms of their hitters and he had an ERA of 2.93 and 12 wins which was very impressive.

Tommy Hansen was great as well, with 2.89 ERA and 11 wins and 4 losses. However I felt that JA Happ was more of a impact for his team as the Phillies was able to win their division and go to the World Series. Admittedly, I thought that JA Happ should have had it, Chris Coghlan only hit 9 homers and drove in 43 runs, that is not impressive at all.

He did hit 321 which was good, but come on, 9 homers and 43 runs driven in should not be the numbers won by the rookie of the year. JA Happ pitched in a really tough division in terms of their hitters and he had an ERA of 2.93 and 12 wins which was very impressive. Tommy Hansen was great as well, with 2.89 ERA and 11 wins and 4 losses.

However I felt that JA Happ was more of a impact for his team as the Phillies was able to win their division and go to the World Series.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions