Use XML Schema to extend an element rather than a complexType?

I would create a new type that mimics foo element and then extend from it. While it's not the best solution, you do get the same result as if you were able to extend the element directly xs:complexType name="fooType.

I would create a new type that mimics foo element and then extend from it. While it's not the best solution, you do get the same result as if you were able to extend the element directly.

Would result in syntax like rather than simply ... which is undesirable. – Mark Elliot Nov 5 '09 at 23:51 No, the result is I think what you were asking for: – Ben Nov 6 '09 at 0:02 Given your edit I'm inclined to agree -- thanks. – Mark Elliot Nov 6 '09 at 1:41.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.