More along the lines of anarcho-capitalism since it stresses individualism, free markets, and the right to private property. America was influenced by classical liberal philosophy (which is far different form of liberalism today), which stressed some market intervention. Anarcho-capitalist only believe in laissez-faire markets with no intervention, no crony capitalism, and no government granted monopolies either by patents or copyrights.
Conservatives believe in voluntary charity rather than coerced charity, which is more along the lines of anarcho-capitalism. It is not Social Darwinism where there is only competition and the "weak" are hung out to dry. Many people, including conservatives, don't mind helping people who help themselves.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost."--Rothbard. EDIT: It depends on your definition of "enough" and "needy". Ultimately it is a moot point, since the welfare state is built upon violence and the ... more.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.