Between the strong circumstantial and DNA evidence present, the chance that Jack The Ripper could have been someone other than Sickert is almost non-existant. Her case is stronger than that of Scott Peterson, an almost completely circumstantial case in California When her investigation was complete she presented it to John Grieve, head detective from Scotland Yard, his response was, had he worked at the Yard in 1888, he would persue the case at the Old Bailey.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.