Were the moon landings a fake?

They were not fake. We landed on the moon 6 times, which I consider to be way too few. Mythbusters even did an episode confirming or busting the usually claimed "proof" that the films were from Earth and not the Moon."This episode was based on the urban legend/conspiracy theory which claims that NASA never landed men on the moon, and instead the achievement was intentionally faked for one reason or another.

Myth 1: One of the NASA photos is fake because the shadows of the rocks and lunar lander are not parallel. Busted The Mythbusters built a small-scale replica of the lunar landing site based on the photograph, using reflective sand similar to that found on the Moon, and a single light to represent the Sun. Next, they took a photo which was exactly the same as the NASA photo, including the differing shadows.

The Mythbusters explained that the shadows were not parallel because of the way the light falls on the Moon’s natural topography. Myth 2: One of the NASA photos is fake because Neil Armstrong can be clearly seen while in the shadow of the lunar lander. Busted To test this myth, the Mythbusters built a large-scale replica of the landing site, allowing them to take a photo which was nearly identical to the original NASA photo.

The Mythbusters explained that Armstrong was visible because of ambient light being reflected off of the Moon’s surface. Myth 3: A flag cannot flap in a vacuum. Busted The Build Team placed a replica of the American flag planted on the moon into a vacuum chamber at the Marshall Space Flight Center.

They first tested at normal pressure and manipulated the flag. The momentum moved the flag around but the motion quickly dissipated.In vacuum conditions, manipulating the flag caused it to flap vigorously as if it were being blown by a breeze. This demonstrated that a flag could appear to wave in a vacuum, as the Apollo flag did.

Myth 4: A clear footprint cannot be made in vacuum because there is no moisture to hold its shape. Busted The Build Team first tested whether dry or wet sand made a more distinguishable footprint by stepping in them with an astronaut boot. It was clear that the wet footprint had more detail than the dry footprint.

They then placed sand similar in composition to the Moon’s soil in a vacuum chamber and stepped on it with an astronaut boot, which made a clear print. The reason provided for this was that the unique composition of lunar soil allows it to behave differently than terrestrial soil. Myth 5: The film of the astronauts moonwalking is actually film of the astronauts skipping in front of a high-framerate camera, slowing down the picture and giving the illusion they are on the Moon.

Busted Adam donned a replica NASA spacesuit and mimicked the astronauts’ motions while being filmed by a slow motion camera. They also attached Adam to wires in order to mimic the Moon’s lower gravity. While comparing their new footage with the original footage, the Mythbusters noted an initial similarity, but there were several small discrepancies attributable to filming in Earth’s gravity.

In order to film in microgravity, the Mythbusters boarded a Reduced Gravity Aircraft and filmed the exact same movements. Adam noted that the movements were more comfortable and more logical in microgravity, and their footage from the plane looked exactly like the original NASA film. The Mythbusters concluded that the moon landing film is authentic.

Myth 6: The Apollo astronauts left behind special equipment on the Moon like reflectors that scientists can bounce lasers off of. Confirmed The Mythbusters went to an observatory equipped with a high powered laser. They first fired at the bare lunar surface but did not detect the laser bouncing back.

Then they pointed the laser at a reflector left behind by NASA and received a confirmed bounce.

See topaz post, I will only add that with the cold war and all the telescopes out there I think they would have been found out and the Soviets would have exposed us for being a fraud. I will add one other conspiracy but a more believable one,is not only did they go (which we all know) but that we were not alone. boingboing.net/2008/07/24/6th-man-on-moo....

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.