Were there certain 'ridiculous' incidents in certain selection committee meetings?

Some of the meetings were actually stormy. In one such meeting, Ganguly was included in the team as an all-rounder. I think it was the most ridiculous thing.

You need to come in, yes, but you name him. You bring him back for a certain reasons and do not call him an all-rounder. Rather you should say: 'Okay, he is better than so and so.' But Ganguly coming in as an all-rounder?

This is the thing that happened. Three selectors got together and just ruled the meeting. Later on the things ironed out better, though.

More, too, was getting better with time and experience. As I said earlier, the number of years you are there, you get better and become more mature about what you are doing. I am sure More understood that he needed to take other selectors into confidence.

And it is a job that is full-time. What are your other memories of the national selection committee you were a member of? I remember the selectors used to sit away from the dressing room.

But if you looked at the Australian ... more.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.