Harassment is the single most misunderstood employment law claim. Many people think that simply being bullied, yelled at or micro-managed in the workplace automatically gives them a claim for harassment. This is not necessarily so.
Whether and to what extent someone may have a claim for harassment depends largely on whether the harassing behavior they are experiencing is because of a protected criteria (e.g. , race, gender, ethnicity, national origin, religion, age, etc.). If a manager is an "equal opportunity jerk" and treats everyone badly, then his/her conduct may not constitute harassment. But if harassing behavior is selectively targeted only at particular groups of employees (e.g. , women only), then the harassed employees may have viable legal claims.
There are two broad categories of sexual harassment: • Quid pro quo, which occurs when an employer or manager conditions an employment benefit on sex (e.g. , "go to bed with me or you're fired"); and • Hostile work environment, ... more.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.