Evidence indicates that an electrical shock applied early after cardiac arrest helps restart the heart so that common practice has set the shock as the first priority when trying to restart the heart. When a shock is given to the heart during cardiac arrest, it resets the abnormal heart rhythm but does not necessarily start blood circulating again. Some more recent evidence indicates that delaying the shock to provide CPR may provide a better chance for the heart to regain its own natural heart beat.
CPR seems to fill the heart with oxygen-rich blood so that when the heart rhythm is reset with the shock, normal circulation can be restored. This circumstance may be especially the case if the patient has been collapsed for more than five minutes. But we don't know for sure which way of doing CPR is better.
More.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.