What is worse - letting your child smoke cigarettes or smoke marijuana?

The reason why I am asking is because my teenage daughter is experimenting with both. Personally, I would prefer that she didn't smoke cigarettes. Asked by DevilDiva 25 months ago Similar questions: worse letting child smoke cigarettes marijuana Health.

Similar questions: worse letting child smoke cigarettes marijuana.

Marijuana is worse on two levels. Marijuana is both mentally debilitating (okay, my youngest daughter and oldest daughter smoke, got that from both their parents but can drive), and more carcinogenic than tobacco. Your standard tobacco has the tar; marijuana has more than forty carcinogens (what George Harrison and Bob Denver died from.) How is your teenage daughter even getting either one?

Find her source and turn him in.

From a health perspective, certainly smoking marijuana is safer and healthier, although putting the byproducts of combustion into your lungs is never safe or healthy. The chances of getting addicted to a lifelong habit is a lot less on marijuana. Unfortunately, for people that try marijuana and have the genetic codeset for an addictive personality, it is a gateway drug to drugs such as crystal meth whch are addictive and can cave serious health implications, including death.

HOWEVER, from a legal aspect, smoking cigarettes is legal, and won’t lead to lengthy prison sentences and the confiscation of assets. The best bet? Don’t allow or encourage them to smoke at all.

Maybe it’s time to be a parent and tell her than until she turns 18, she isn’t allowed to do either. Perhaps you should have her volunteer at a hospital on the unit that handles COPD related to smoking so she can see what her future holds.

1 (Taking a deep toke and exhaling slowly. )Letting them smoke cigarettes. This user has been banned from Askville.

1 (Taking a deep toke and exhaling slowly. )Letting them smoke cigarettes.

(Taking a deep toke and exhaling slowly. )Letting them smoke cigarettes.

2 I would agree with you Dee and yes it would be better if she did neither. But the cigarette companies have added over 200 chemicals to make cigarettes very dangerous. This user has been banned from Askville.

2 I would agree with you Dee and yes it would be better if she did neither. But the cigarette companies have added over 200 chemicals to make cigarettes very dangerous.

I would agree with you Dee and yes it would be better if she did neither. But the cigarette companies have added over 200 chemicals to make cigarettes very dangerous.

3 If I had to choose, I would say cigarettes .

If I had to choose, I would say cigarettes.

It's in my skin, not my clothes. What gives?" "Have you shared your marijuana smoke with your cat? " ""3rd Hand Smoke" - is it time to make cigarettes illegal?

" "Is it patriotic to encourage today's children to smoke cigarettes and be overweight?" "How do I remove smoke from cigarettes from a glass fixture? " "Would you rather eat a deep-fried twinkie, or smoke a pack of cigarettes? " "What brand of cigarettes does Barack Obama smoke?

Why doesn't the government just quit letting the cigarette companys make cigarettes.

It's in my skin, not my clothes. What gives?

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.