Whatever happened to "swine flu" in the media?

It was yet another over-exaggerated story to entertain people. People love to hate; that's why they watch the news. But to address your question, more people have swine flu than ever before.

But the fact remains that just like SARS, MRSA, and bird flu, it was a temporary craze to give people something to talk about. In addition, scientists and medical researchers did not know how deadly swine flu was, whether it would get worse, whether it would improve, or whether it would cause another massive plague. The media took advantage of the slim possibility that it was going to be a terrible pandemic to get more viewers.

The WHO, or World Health Organization, also probably made quite a few bucks from the whole deal. It really is pathetic; the media has more control over the masses than most people know. Or care to admit.

But people can only worry about the same old thing for so long. It just became a boring topic because it is not as deadly as people first thought it would be. So it joins the bird flu, SARS, and the medicine-resistant skin-eating disease MRSA on the sidelines.

Sometime soon, there will probably be another irrelevant sickness for the media to promote.

Swine flu has reduce and their will be a vaccine in the fall...pregnant women will be a priority.

It is supposed to be called H1N1. It isn't related to swine (pigs).

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.