What's the proper and easiest way of handling content URLs in ASP.NET MVC?

You can use link href="", url. Content(path)); } } This keeps the view lighter, and I can just type %= Url. Asset("some_asset") % and be done with it When .

NET 4.0 comes out, and you update your code base, you'll change your static to return a shiny new MvcHtmlString This will happily prevent and double-escaping. (And you'll want to do this in any code that writes out HTML. ).

You can use " /> to point to some file. Using relative locations (your first example) won't work all the time because of the way routing can change depending on the current URL. In most of my projects, I use URL helpers to do this kind of thing.

Public static class ExtensionsOfUrlHelper { // TODO: Prepare for . NET 4.0, this will return MvcHtmlString public static string Asset(this UrlHelper url, string asset) { var path = "~/assets/" + asset; return string. Format("", url.

Content(path)); } } This keeps the view lighter, and I can just type... ... and be done with it. When . NET 4.0 comes out, and you update your code base, you'll change your static to return a shiny new MvcHtmlString.

This will happily prevent and double-escaping. (And you'll want to do this in any code that writes out HTML. ).

Good advice. I didn't know of Url.Content() helper. I'll wait a bit more to keep answers coming, thanks.

– ssg Dec 11 '09 at 11:54 Don't forget about the other HTML helpers such as ActionLink(), etc. – GalacticCowboy Dec 11 '09 at 11:57.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.