When creationists claim mutations can't result in new genes, is it dishonesty or ignorance?

They don't understand genetics,speciation, and dominant vs recessive traits or gene frequency very well, in fact they think that if one animal doesn't immediately give birth to a completely different one then that must mean that they can't evolve at all. Macroevolution is simply the accumulation of selected mutations or microevolution.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.