Where did Kerry get this 98% or 99% figure of all scientists in the world support Climate Change, hook line and sinker?

There you have the crux of the situation. That 97% of all scientists claim by the greenies is just a bunch of propaganda. That 97% was generated by 75 out of 77 unnamed scientists.

Those of us who are true scientists have asked to see who those 75 were. As of yet no one knows. Those who admitted to believing in Climate Change are now against the theory of Climate Change.

Quote by Madhav L. Khandekar, UN scientist, a retired Environment Canada scientist: "Unfortunately, the IPCC climate change documents do not provide an objective assessment of the earth's temperature trends and associated climate change…. As one of the invited expert reviewers for the 2007 IPCC documents, I have pointed out the flawed review process used by the IPCC scientists in one of my letters.

I have also pointed out in my letter that an increasing number of scientists are now questioning the hypothesis of Greenhouse gas induced warming of the earth's surface and suggesting a stronger impact of solar variability and large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns on the observed temperature increase than previously believed." One of the fathers of Germany’s modern green movement, Professor Dr. Fritz Vahrenholt, a social democrat and green activist, decided to author a climate science skeptical book together with geologist/paleontologist Dr. Sebastian Lüning. Vahrenholt’s skepticism started when he was asked to review an IPCC report on renewable energy.

He found hundreds of errors. When he pointed them out, IPCC officials simply brushed them aside. Stunned, he asked himself, “Is this the way they approached the climate assessment reports?

Vahrenholt decided to do some digging. His colleague Dr. Lüning also gave him a copy of Andrew Montford’s The Hockey Stick Illusion. He was horrified by the sloppiness and deception he found.

Persuaded by Hoffmann & Campe, he and Lüning decided to write the book. Die kalte Sonne cites 800 sources and has over 80 charts and figures. It examines and summarizes the latest science.

Vahrenholt concluded, through his research, that the science of the IPCC (if you can call it that) was mostly political and had been “hyped. You can see many more who deny the ACC theory now, as you have pointed out. It leaves one to ask, "Just where all these 97% of all the scientists of the world, as claimed, and why do they leave hacks like Al Gore and Bill Nye to do their bidding?"

If I was in a prominent position and could wholeheartedly endorse a scientific idea or theory, I would gladly attach my name to it. But you have people, like Michael Mann, who stuck his neck out and produced a fabricated 'hockey stick' and now is in legal trouble for obvious corruption. You also have Phil Jones who oversaw the corruption of vital data at East Anglia and got caught.

He played scabby knees and kept his job but that is what happens when the truth finally catches up with the professional scam artists and outright frauds. You don't see a list of greenie scientists like the 31,000 skeptics named in petitionproject.org because they are ashamed to admmit their part in this scam. It is rather obvious.

First maybe you should look for a list of scientists that support evolution. You'd be in pretty much the same boat. If you can;t find a list of scientists that support evolution then that would mean that evolution is debatable now wouldn't it?

Then again you could just go to http://scholar.google.ca and look for yourself but I'm sure that would be too much work for you as you don't really care about anything that does not meet your preconceived notion.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.