Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Seriously?

In serious terms, the egg came first before the chicken. -quote- "It is a question that has vexed philosophers since the Greeks. But it seems we may now have the answer to the beguilingly simple question: "Which came first?"

It's the egg. This reassuring conclusion was the work of an expert panel including a philosopher, geneticist and chicken farmer. "Whether chicken eggs preceded chickens hinges on the nature of chicken eggs," said panel member and philosopher of science David Papineau at King's College London."I would argue it's a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it.

If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg. By this reasoning, the first chicken did indeed come from a chicken egg, even though that egg didn't come from chickens." -end of quote.

As many have pointed out, the concept of egg was establish long before anyone had ever heard of a chicken. This doesn't really answer your intriguing question though, as one has to assume that the question concerns chicken eggs. So, what came first, the chicken or the egg?

This actually boils down to how you define a chicken egg. Is a chicken egg an egg laid by a chicken or is it an egg that will produce a chicken? The answer will follow directly from the definition you feel is accurate.

If you are looking for a true scientific answer to your question, the answer would be that it's a tie. The theory of evolution points to the chicken an the chicken egg evolving simultaneously. Though both chicken and chicken egg have evolved from birds that were not chickens, in evolution you can never point to one individual that becomes a new species.

There will always be a huge body of tiny variations that can't be pinpointed to an exact moment or individual animal.

Plural of moose is not meese but goose becomes geese. Why do lighter warnings state "Do not expose to open flame"? So this question has been answered in our group of drunken wise men......The chicken had to come first because who was going to sit on the egg to hatch it?

And, if that wasn't enough, how come they find prehistoric everything but eggs? Somewhere there has to be a fossilized egg or one stuck in layers of rock or in a tar pit. These are the possible things we have actually discussed.

There is also the CNN report about the whole discussion being "unscrambled" I also like this video which explains it all!

Francis Crick who discovered DNA, along w/James Watson formulated what they called the "Central Dogma of Molecular Biology" in 1957. This says that the you "begin" with the information contained in nucleic acids (DNA & RNA) and amino acid sequences and "go to" proteins. In other words you cannot create an organism without first having its genetic information.

Therefore the "Egg" comes before the chicken. P.S. About the word "dogma" although it may seem like an unpleasant choice, they meant it as a "fundamental assumption" not as a "faith based truth.

The egg would be first. As evolution works through genetic mutation the first chicken still began within the egg. Mutations occur genetically not after birth.As back up for my logic... science.howstuffworks.com/genetic-scienc....

The egg. For example, dinosaurs were born from eggs way before chickens were even around. Reproducing via egg was an early way of adapting to life on land; when all animals lived underwater (as I'm sure you've heard, the officially adopted theory out there is that all life originated from the sea), reproduction and development would occur underwater, but when animals began moving to live on land, their reproduction style began to change.

The egg contains essential nutrients the young would need, as well as an all-water environment that their species require to reproduce successfully. The chicken then came later, evolving - as other birds did - from the small feathered animal called the Archaeopteryx.

Evolution, in which case the "chicken" came first. Things evolved and evolved and eventually a chicken was seen running around! How did life begin you may ask?

Energy created small, small molecules.

It should be the egg. We didn't see it but ..still I think it's the composition.. after grows and mature permutations see'ya nice question.

The egg, as eggs were also laid by dinosaurs, because they were reptilians. And the chicken came waaaaaaaay after the extinction of the dinosaur.

A team of geneticist has found the answer to one of the most baffling question. And the answer is "the egg. " -----quote--- It's a question that has baffled scientists, academics and pub bores through the ages: What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Now a team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg. Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.

----end of quote.

In nature, living things evolve through changes in their DNA. In an animal like a chicken, DNA from a male sperm cell and a female ovum meet and combine to form a zygote -- the first cell of a new baby chicken. This first cell divides innumerable times to form all of the cells of the complete animal.In any animal, every cell contains exactly the same DNA, and that DNA comes from the zygote.

Chickens evolved from non-chickens through small changes caused by the mixing of male and female DNA or by mutations to the DNA that produced the zygote. These changes and mutations only have an effect at the point where a new zygote is created. That is, two non-chickens mated and the DNA in their new zygote contained the mutation(s) that produced the first true chicken.

That one zygote cell divided to produce the first true chicken. Prior to that first true chicken zygote, there were only non-chickens. The zygote cell is the only place where DNA mutations could produce a new animal, and the zygote cell is housed in the chicken's egg.

So, the egg must have come first.

The chicken or the egg Suggestions from Answers. Com contributors: The Chicken Using literature, the chicken comes first Using grammar, "the chicken" comes first in the sentence (They come before the words, "the egg. ") In a dictionary, the word "chicken" comes before "egg Recent studies now show that the chicken came first, because of the methodology of evolution.An egg cannot occur unless a bird, or in this case a chicken, is able to lay that egg The answer is the chicken: God created all the animals and not all the eggs.

It's easy because for those that believe in m God made animals not eggs. The chicken because God wouldn't just put a egg on the earth and even if he did nothing would warm the egg for it to hatch The chicken...it had to be. Creatures in the sea evolved and they didn't evolve into eggs now, did they?

The chicken. It has to be around to lay the egg In the seven days that God created the earth, it makes no mention of animals' eggs. Thus, the chicken came first I say that the chicken came first because the chicken was made before the egg because God made all the animals first and birds and etc..... so the chicken came first before the egg, the eggs came when a male (rooster) and a female chicken repopulate with each other The chicken came first because, if the chicken didn't come first, there would be no egg or care for it.

So, God had to make the chicken first If you are an evolutionist, you probably think that the chicken evolved from a dinosaur or something. But the chicken came first; if you think about it, how was the chicken alive before the egg The Egg The egg, dinosaurs were laying them far before the chicken's existence The answer is the egg! For an animal to change, its genetics would have to change also and this is impossible.

Therefore the change would have to take place as an embryo or egg. So the first chicken was most likely spawned in prehistoric times as an embryo/egg. Concluding that the first living organism had to come from the form of an egg or embryo The egg would have come first laid from another animal when it was hatched it was that animal but had to move its habitat so it had to adjust and became the chicken Theoretically, the egg must come first.

A chicken is conceived and born in an egg; therefore, without the egg the chicken could not have been either conceived or born, it may be that the egg was the product of two different species accidentally mating to conceive the egg that contained the first, "chicken" as we know it. The egg came first, think about it logically, instead of trying to question it, there is no other logical/practical conclusion The egg came first. Two animals who really liked each other and were not the same breed, mated and the female laid an egg and it came out a chicken.

They didn't know what to call it so they just named it chicken. Therefore the chicken is a crossbreed. I don't know what between though The egg came first.

Dinosaurs laid eggs for millions of years before chickens were present on Earth The egg came first because other animals came before the chicken that had eggs of some kind. One kind are the fish in the seas; fish lay eggs. Another are snakes; snakes also lay eggs A chicken could not have its genetic material altered during life, so the egg must have evolved and been first If you take into account the doctrine of evolution, the egg's coming first becomes plausible on the cellular level under perfect circumstances (abundant food and resources).

There will be an asexual reproduction once the environment becomes unfavorable. The species would then evolve, and a lot of animals have no parental instincts but through evolution some have started to look after their young An asexual reproduction is reproduction in which there is no fusion of male and female sex cells gametes The egg came first because the chicken descended from a dinosaur, and it laid an egg that was changed from Darwin's theory The egg came first because a chicken comes from an egg.At whatever point you decide to call the chicken a true chicken, it must have come from an egg. Because the different species before it must have evolved to make a chicken, the egg came first The egg comes first because a bird a long long time ago evolving into a chicken lays an egg which hatches into a chicken An egg comes first, because dinosaurs laid eggs, and chickens didn't exist at that time Simple.

The Egg Egg. I am not trained in philosophy, but my reasoning is simple and seems solid to me. If it was not born from an egg, it would not meet the definition of chicken so it must have come from an egg.

A bird that is not a chicken can still lay an egg with a chicken in it if there is a genetic abnormality in the egg being laid. Because chickens were not the first life form on earth, it conforms to our current scientific understanding that the first ever chicken to be born was a genetic abnormality. Because genetic abnormalities that survive are not substantially different from the original, it is very likely that the parent of the chicken was genetically very similar to a chicken and was an egg layer.

The first chicken was a genetic abnormality born from an egg that was laid by a similar parent that was not genetically similar enough to meet the definition of 'Chicken The egg came first. Darwin's Theory of Evolution infers genetic adaptation. This adaptation occurs when parents' DNA is copied inaccurately throughout a species and the strongest of the adaptations survive.

The male and female chickens DNA is copied during the mitosis/meiosis process and form the gametes that go on to form the blastocyte/morula/foetus in the egg - so the egg came first Neither Isn't it both? Because the chicken would have to teach the chick how to do stuff and the egg to reproduce the chickens The chickens most recent ancestor laid the egg. Think of it this way: along the slow and steady evolution from single celled organisms to full fledged modern chickens, at some point, if you could observe every animal in that evolutionary line, you would have to say, "well, this one's not a chicken, but the next one is.

" The line simply must be drawn somewhere.So whatever egg that the first chicken hatched from would have come first! There is no final answer but the most reasonable conclusion is that a certain breed of dinosaur laid an egg, then a period of extremely cold weather preserved the egg. Whilst that occurred the egg genetic form was rearranged into a creature similar to the chicken.At first the animal could have been very different from the chicken we know today but over time it changed into the chicken form we are so familiar with today Neither the chicken, nor the egg came first.

It was the rooster that came first The egg and the chicken came at the same time. The chicken and the egg are just two different names for the same process or being.It's like water on its way to becoming ice is still water, and vice versa Darwin's theory; the chicken egg came from a different species There is no answer. Since the question is a paradox, there is no answer.

If the chicken came first, it came from the egg. If the egg came first, then it came from a chicken, and so forth Evolution suggests that both chickens and eggs evolved from creatures and "egg-things" you would not recognize to be part of the lineage. (Similar to how, in the very distant past, some molecules that was were not what we would call "life" became "life".

) That was the beginning There is no correct answer that can be proven.It's all theory This question has been debated about so many times but no-one really knows. It is undecided I think its both because the chicken wouldn't have been born without a female parent and the female parent would most likely came first in an egg also given birth by the mother Additional information: Without some very serious scientific intervention an egg cannot be produced independently of its parent's body, whether that parent is a chicken, a lizard, or a spider So the chicken had to be there first, for the egg to form. Scientific researchers at the University of Sheffield in England published a report - see link below - in July 2010 confirming this, although their research is more concerned with shells in general: eggs were produced by the earliest egg-producing creatures millennia before chickens evolved The scientists involved in this research weren't interested in solving unsolvable riddles, but in discovering more about how shells are formed The question of whether the chicken or the egg came first can never be answered: it is unanswerable.

One can work out which came first, the wheel or the wheeled vehicle, because one caused the invention of the other, but when we look at life-forms we cannot say with any degree of authority whether the grass seed came before the blade of grass, or whether the bird came before the egg, because life simply doesn't work in terms of traceable inventions Today we can taste a delicious new strain of tomato and know the seed that produced that improved tomato was developed from tomato plants considered to be less delicious: this new seed came first, before this new tomato. But it came after the other, less delicious, tomato, and that tomato's seeds came before it and so on.

Which came first the chicken or the egg Asked by pappachubbs 5 days ago Similar questions: chicken egg Entertainment > Humor.

We eat eggs for breakfast and chicken for dinner...

If I would answer this based on the Bible- the chicken would be 1st..but from evolution - might be from egg..

The egg would be easier to get ahold of, so I'd say the egg.

I am allergic to eggs and chicken. " "what came first the chicken or the egg? " "What whas first , the chicken ore de egg?" "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Not no but he-- no. Find the person who told you that a six lug rim will fit on a five lug hub and smack-m-up-side-da-head.

The EGG came first. Dinosaurs (reptiles) were laying eggs millions of years before chickens evolved and chickens (birds) evolved from reptiles.

I would say the chicken came first. Noah had the animals two by two on his ark. I don't remember any mention of eggs.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.