23% is more than anyone else, including your heroine. That makes him the front runner. But don't worry--when was the last time the (non-incumbant or VP) front runner got the nomination?
Nov. 2007--Hillary Clinton; Rudolph Giuliani & Mitt Romney Jan. 2004--Howard Dean Jan 2000--Al Gore (VP); Feb 1999--George W Bush Feb 1996--Robert Dole Jan 1992--Jerry Brown Jan 1988--Gary Hart & G H W Bush (VP) Jan 1984--Walter Mondale (VP) Feb 1980--Ronald Reagan Jan 1976--Hubert Humphrey Jan 1972--EdMuskie Jan 1968--Lyndon Johnson (incumbant) & Feb 1968--Richard Nixon Feb 1964--Nelson Rockefeller Jan 1960--John F Kennedy & Feb 1960--Richard Nixon Jan 1956--Adlai Stevenson Jan 1952--Harry Truman (incumbant) & Feb 1952--Dwight Eisenhower I stand corrected--for the Democrats, the early front-runner does not usually get the nomination (unless he is the incumbant or the sitting VP; not included in my notes unless he lost). The last two were JFK and Adlai. For Repubs, however, 8 out of 10 early front runners ended up getting the nomination; most recently Bush in 2000.
Not that the Republican nominee, whomever is chosen, has a real chance of defeating Obama.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.