Too long. Here is a Jim Cramer segment that makes me cringe youtube.com/watch?v=Rl6hIrleMIw.
Stewart. He single handedly sunk Crossfire.
Cramer swings wide in his opinions: 11/30/08 (it would be reckless to stay so negative ) - trillions of dollars are moving out of the market. 3/21/08 (I call it a bottom) - Market peaked in 2006 and drop to below 7000 by 2009. The bottom is approaching 5000.
Bear Stearns risks were astronomically high: sub prime, CDS, and CDO exposures. Is Cramer a momentum trader or a technical trader? Is Cramer sitting on top of his money?
My vote is for Jon Stewart.
Stewart/Colbert/Cramer Nation, Here is a Promo Poster/Image I made for Thursday's showdown! Hopefully Cramer or Stewart will see this and use it on Wednesday to promote the show! gloombergnews.com/?p=470 GN.
I'm going to say that it depends on the tone Cramer goes into this with. If he is there to joke around and have fun then the outcome will be in favor Stewart. Because Stewart is intelligent, quick, and able to improv well.
IF Cramer goes in with the intent of correcting Stewart's attitude I would have to give Cramer the edge as he is also very intelligent, experienced, passionate, and dedicated. It's the old saying "old age and treachery will over come youth and exuberance every time. " I think the more likely outcome will be a situation where they poke at each other chuckle a few times and Cramer will make some points and Stewart will poke at his Bear Stearns comments and in the end they will laugh it off and part on more or less even ground.So, a tie of sorts... that would be my vote.
Well, like everyone else, I'm picking Stewart. (and as an aside, I like Stewart a lot more than Cramer). However, it's not a fair fight.
Stewart's job is that of an external critic and a humorist. Cramer's job is to make regular predictions about future factual events. Only one of these jobs is going to produce a verifiable track record with (no matter how good you are) many mistakes.
Stewart's job has given him the expertise in dissecting records like that for his audience's amusement. Even if Cramer was really good and Stewart wasn't my favorite, it would still be Advantage Stewart. Cramer can only win a consolation prize for showing a bit of self-humor and being a good sport.
If he does that well, both men will win with their own audiences.
Stewart, hands down. How is Cramer possibly going to refute that he suggested buying Bear Stearns? I don't really see how they are going to face each other than Cramer arguing with Stewart about what he said in the past.
Well, like everyone else, I'm picking Stewart. (and as an aside, I like Stewart a lot more than Cramer). However, it's not a fair fight.
Stewart's job is that of an external critic and a humorist. Cramer's job is to make regular predictions about future factual events. Only one of these jobs is going to produce a verifiable track record with (no matter how good you are) many mistakes.
Stewart's job has given him the expertise in dissecting records like that for his audience's amusement. Even if Cramer was really good and Stewart wasn't my favorite, it would still be Advantage Stewart. Cramer can only win a consolation prize for showing a bit of self-humor and being a good sport.
If he does that well, both men will win with their own audiences. Well, like everyone else, I'm picking Stewart. (and as an aside, I like Stewart a lot more than Cramer).
However, it's not a fair fight. Stewart's job is that of an external critic and a humorist. Cramer's job is to make regular predictions about future factual events.
Only one of these jobs is going to produce a verifiable track record with (no matter how good you are) many mistakes. Stewart's job has given him the expertise in dissecting records like that for his audience's amusement. Even if Cramer was really good and Stewart wasn't my favorite, it would still be Advantage Stewart.
Cramer can only win a consolation prize for showing a bit of self-humor and being a good sport. If he does that well, both men will win with their own audiences. You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars.
If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question. Stewart, hands down. How is Cramer possibly going to refute that he suggested buying Bear Stearns?
I don't really see how they are going to face each other than Cramer arguing with Stewart about what he said in the past. Stewart, hands down. How is Cramer possibly going to refute that he suggested buying Bear Stearns?
I don't really see how they are going to face each other than Cramer arguing with Stewart about what he said in the past. You can leave an optional "tip" with Mahalo's virtual currency, Mahalo Dollars. If you are asking a difficult question that might require some research, or if you'd like a wide variety of feedback, a higher tip often leads to more answers to your question.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.