You are making a lot of assumptions there. "Classic Arabic" is a misnomer. It was dialect Arabic at the time of Muhammad and not a uniform written language.
The so-called "beautiful poetry and prose" is actually a grammatical and incomprehensible mess in many parts of the Koran. It just doesn't make sense even in Arabic. The verses were indeed compiled much later after the prophet's death with the Uthmanic recension of the Koran.
And even during the time of the prophet, we know that fragments were written by scribes upon chards, leaves and bone or upon whatever was available. But, the original sayings or so-called revelations of Muhammad were never a unitary literary work. And according to hadith traditions, some of it had been lost.
The Koran itself is a hotch-potch of borrowed source material from Hebrew scripture, the Christian New Testament, late Christian apochryphal literature, Rabbinical Judaism, pre-Islamic Arabian legend and tradition, the Hanefites, as well as Persian and Greek sources. It also contains the stories and legends of the exploits of Muhammad with Muhammad's own injunctions. Like all Semitic languages, the Koran originally never had vowel pointing which caused confusion over the proper reading or even the intended meaning of many words.
A thorough study of Source Criticism, Redaction Criticism, Form Criticism, Historico-literary Criticism and Textual Criticism will easily dismantle any of the Othodox Muslim claims regarding the origins of the Koran. Whenever a perfectly natural, rational explanation can be provided for any phenomenon, there is no reason to assume a supernatural one since supernatural agency is outside the realm of normal human experience. It is not rational to assume what is not common to normal human experience.
Since there is nothing in the Koran or it origins that cannot otherwise be explained through human agency, there is no reason to assume a divine agency.
About 20-40 different men 'scribes' wrote the quran, according to islamic sources. They wrote what muhammad said he recieved from god. One scribe ran off when he realised muhammad was making stuff up.
.................... @Slave to Allah (Revert Muslimah) : Thinks Allah wrote quran,no wonder your a 'revert'. With a brain like that anyone could convert you. Abdollah Bin Sa’d Bin Abi Sarh, who was one of the scribes of Muhammad in Medina: "...had been one of the scribes employed at Medina to write down the revelations.
On a number of occasions he had, with the Prophet’s consent, changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the Prophet had said "And God is mighty and wise" (aziz, hakim), Abdollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down 'knowing and wise' (alim, hakim), and the prophet answered that there was no objection.
Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Abdollah renounced Islam on the ground that the revelations, if from God, could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy, he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites."3 Muhammad actually ordered killing this scribe when he took over Mecca. He, the scribe, was saved, through his foster brother, Uthman, who begged the Prophet for Abdollah’s life. In any case, this story shows that even Muhammad himself was not keen on preserving the Qur’an as it was exactly (i.e.
Word by word, and letter by letter) “revealed” to him by the angel Gabriel. One can easily assume that Muhammad (PBUH) accepted other suggested changes to the Qur’an by some of the other scribes too.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.