Why are doctors concerned about the level of your creatine?

Creatinine is one of the three enzymes that a distressed heart will make in the presence of a heart attack. Sometimes (about 25%) Electrocardiograms will not be able to show heart injury, so doctors rely on enzyme markers to diagnose heart attack and properly treat their patients.

The error "Indirect modification of overloaded property" is well known in the context of changing arrays returned by get I could thus imagine that read has to return by reference: public function &read(...) { ... } But following from the fact that this is mentioned nowhere on the whole internet, I assume that the fault lies in someplace different. Probably in some of your "unrelated" code.

The error "Indirect modification of overloaded property" is well known in the context of changing arrays returned by __get. I could thus imagine that read has to return by reference: public function &read(...) { ... } But following from the fact that this is mentioned nowhere on the whole internet, I assume that the fault lies in someplace different. Probably in some of your "unrelated" code.

Well, actually all other methods inside the session class are there, but empty and does nothing right now. I've tried to change accordingly to the example of yours and Notice: Only variable references should be returned by reference are thrown now also :( – Industrial Feb 11 at 16:56 @Industrial: That may well be the problem. PHP expects these methods to do something.

If the all just return null things will obviously not work... You should first implement all methods, then go for debugging – NikiC Feb 11 at 17:04 I had done that earlier and then emptied them out with no difference. However I took a longshot after googling and found about the problems with session_write_close(); and after adding this function as the last one in my script - everything works well. Woooo!(Info here php.Net/manual/en/function.

Session-write-close. Php) – Industrial Feb 11 at 17:14.

Eid ul-Fitr is celebrated on the first day of Shaw'waal, at the completion of Ramadan.

Any time someone feels that someone else is doing something wrong in public there will be objections. Legally we're required to keep our noses out of other people's private lives, but the media keeps pushing people's private lives into our noses. I don't care if you're gay, straight, solo or swinger.

I don't care if you sleep with your favorite pet - I didn't ask to hear about it, see it on the news or have to filter my search results because you posted a video about it. Your sex life is boring to me. Do I object to civil unions that do not state whether or not a person has to have had sex to make it legal?No.

Civil unions apply even in non-sexual relationships and are useful to grant legal rights to the persons involved. In fact civil unions shouldn't be limited to only two persons either. Anyone should be able to enter into a legal relationship that allows for specific rights to be shared equally among them.

What is the big deal about gay people wanting to be married like their parents were? Why not create a legal institution that is as unique as they are? Unfortunately the fascination with the title "marriage" is more throwing it in the faces of those who don't approve than it is "special".

I never needed anyone's approval to get married. Many people live their entire lives together without needing the title OR the legal hassles. Gay people need heterosexual relationships or the human race would quickly disappear, so don't h8 the str8 either.

There's what some people call a natural order to things that without, even the ability to have an opinion on it would be moot. Is it wrong that kids who are 9 are having sex and babies? Is it wrong that a woman loves her horse in ways that require special equipment and a spotter?

Is it wrong that some people liked being choked, spanked, humiliated and peed on to get off? See? I don't want to know the details of your sex life.

Frankly, I don't want you to know mine either. So don't ask me to vote on changing the legal definition of "marriage" because you don't like the status quo. I have an idea, let gay people have "marriage" and give "civil unions" to everyone else.

That'll fix everything! Unless of course then gay people would want civil unions too. Or as someone else put it, "get tattoos and piercings to express your individuality - just like everyone else".

I guess the bottom line is, you can't please everybody. And if you do, you're either a prostitute or a polygamist and that's a whole bunch of other people waiting for their turn in the battle for legalization!( That should inspire more answers to the question. But considering how hard it has become to use Mahalo at all anymore - I wouldn't hold your breath.

I just wanted to see if my last question (a year ago) ever got answered, and it didn't. Anyway, for the record, the views contained herein are a mashup of comments that caught my attention gathered together to further discussion. Personal attacks or judgements will be wasted since I don't really care one way or the other.My real answer is the first sentence only.

).

Any time someone feels that someone else is doing something wrong in public there will be objections. Legally we're required to keep our noses out of other people's private lives, but the media keeps pushing people's private lives into our noses. I don't care if you're gay, straight, solo or swinger.

I don't care if you sleep with your favorite pet - I didn't ask to hear about it, see it on the news or have to filter my search results because you posted a video about it. Your sex life is boring to me. Do I object to civil unions that do not state whether or not a person has to have had sex to make it legal?

No. Civil unions apply even in non-sexual relationships and are useful to grant legal rights to the persons involved. In fact civil unions shouldn't be limited to only two persons either.

Anyone should be able to enter into a legal relationship that allows for specific rights to be shared equally among them. What is the big deal about gay people wanting to be married like their parents were? Why not create a legal institution that is as unique as they are?

Unfortunately the fascination with the title "marriage" is more throwing it in the faces of those who don't approve than it is "special". I never needed anyone's approval to get married. Many people live their entire lives together without needing the title OR the legal hassles.

Gay people need heterosexual relationships or the human race would quickly disappear, so don't h8 the str8 either. There's what some people call a natural order to things that without, even the ability to have an opinion on it would be moot. Is it wrong that kids who are 9 are having sex and babies?

Is it wrong that a woman loves her horse in ways that require special equipment and a spotter? Is it wrong that some people liked being choked, spanked, humiliated and peed on to get off? See?

I don't want to know the details of your sex life. Frankly, I don't want you to know mine either. So don't ask me to vote on changing the legal definition of "marriage" because you don't like the status quo.

I have an idea, let gay people have "marriage" and give "civil unions" to everyone else. That'll fix everything! Unless of course then gay people would want civil unions too.

Or as someone else put it, "get tattoos and piercings to express your individuality - just like everyone else". I guess the bottom line is, you can't please everybody. And if you do, you're either a prostitute or a polygamist and that's a whole bunch of other people waiting for their turn in the battle for legalization!

( That should inspire more answers to the question. But considering how hard it has become to use Mahalo at all anymore - I wouldn't hold your breath. I just wanted to see if my last question (a year ago) ever got answered, and it didn't.

Anyway, for the record, the views contained herein are a mashup of comments that caught my attention gathered together to further discussion. Personal attacks or judgements will be wasted since I don't really care one way or the other. My real answer is the first sentence only.

).

I personally have no opinion on the topic- coz A) I am not gay so I have no interest in it B) If someone else gay, it really doesn't matter coz its his/her life Live and let others live.

Well.. I'm a Christian & I know that the Bible says that only a man & a woman should be married. Like my 10th grade Bible teacher always said, God created Adam & EVE. Not Adam & STEVE.

But personally, I think if people want to have a gay marriage, then they should be able to.

I personally am against Gay Marriage, because of my religious convictions.

If you would like to make your own website, Weebly is free and easy to use! You can register, than choose a design layout and begin making your website! You can find more information here: weebly.com.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.