In my opinion it's not. Because it's not a non answer. Doesn't matter if it's not helpful/correct/ of value etc etc. The rule just says shouldn't be non answer.
The disclaimer states accuracy isn't evaluated. I've been hit so many times for such answers and every single appeal I won. There has not been a single appeal that's been declined or where there was no response, for the past 11 months.
So yes it is certainly a grey area or of doubt that answering a violation is itself a violation by default. No documentation or written evidence exists the way CG is. And to date even Yahoo hasn't addressed that.
Do note you have a chance to win the appeal here. The appeal handler isn't going to agree that answering violation is violation. It's just not a "clear cut" violation regardless of what others say.
I've been here 9 years and many trusted members have ended up burning their TR when they tried targeting me for this (in extreme cases TR snatched too completely for stalking me).
Your Answer Was Not Helpful As Others Have Stated Its Considered A Non Answer You Should've Just Left The Question Alone And Go Answer Something Else.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.