Why do creationists believe that evolution is 'monkeys giving birth to humans'?

My response to all anti-evolutionist questions for the time being is this five part challenge. The first one should be a doddle, but they get harder. 1.

Define exactly what you mean by evolution and compare it to the definition used by biologists for 75 years. 2. Explain why young Earth creationists do not preach to mining, oil, pharmaceutical, agrochemical or biotechnology companies.

3. Explain why there are no creation scientists listed in the patent records as inventors for any invention in biotechnology, agrochemistry or pharmaceuticals. 4.

Explain why Duane Gish claimed that the Wadjak skulls were found at the same level and near the Java man fossils when the finds were 105 miles apart, the skulls in a cave by a marble quarry at Wadjak, the Java man near the Sulo River by Trinil. That's in Java, by the way, not Dixie. 5.

Put your lab coats on and find any biochemical, molecular biological or other mechanism in organisms that prevent formation of new species. Now, in your particular case I want 10 x 12 full color glossy photographs of the aliens, signed by the aliens.

Only a Creationist believes that is what has been proposed. No such thing has ever happened in the Natural world. A monkey never gave birth to an ape.

An ape never gave birth to a human. This is a creationist misunderstanding of basic biology and evolutionary process.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.