Why do fundies reject evolution, then proceed to ask questions of evolution, demand detailed answers...?

The answer to your question is yes, and it is a shame, particularly since they don’t even know what they are trying to prove. Take “jeff”, for example. He claims “evolution” occurs over a long period of time because dogs have the “genetic code of a wolf”.

Yet, he correctly calls these “adaptations”, NOT evolution. This evidence demonstrates creation theory since dogs and wolves arose from the original dog-wolf KIND created by God. This says nothing about the theory of evolution.

He claims evolution is the “adaptions of life”, but that is NOT what the theory of evolution states. Darwin’s theory claims that all the life we see today arose from a common ancestor billions of years ago, which evolutionists claim arose from non-living matter. This is much more than simply “adations of life”.

And “creationism” is not simply the “origin of life”. Creation theory is a scientific theory which states that all the diversity of life we see today arose from a set of originally created kinds over thousands of years through processes such as mutations and natural selection. This theory is supported by every branch of science with overwhelming empirical evidence.

Flunky suggest that you are calling the pope an atheist, but this is clearly not the case since the pope does NOT believe in the theory of evolution. In addition, the official stance of the Catholic Church is a plain reading of Genesis. The clergy letter project is irrelevant.

People believe a lot of stupid things. The FACT however, is that according to surveys 99% of leading evolutionists are Athiest and 94% of the National Academy of science is Atheist or Agnostic. The people SELLING and PROMOTING the theory of evolution are overwhelmingly ATHEIST!

The fact that some Christians have been duped into believing it is secondary. Creation theory is the best available scientific explanation for the present state of life on this planet. Perhaps it is “flunky” that is “lazy and/or not that bright” because she has failed to even understand what scientific creation theory is all about.

Evolution is the best available scientific explanation for the present state of life on this planet. This has nothing to do with whether or not God actually created the universe, though it does disprove strict, literal biblical creationism. And your failure to read and/or comprehend the answers you are given doesn't mean that people aren't answering the questions, it just means that you are lazy and/or not that bright.

Some reading for you: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evoluti... http://talkorigins.org/ http://www.strangescience.net/evolution.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/search/topicbrowse2.php?topic_id=46 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descent.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions