That's an example of a generalized and prejudiced statement. Step into reality. I'm a hunter, and a democrat.. .. And I'm from Texas, land of the ZOMBIES!
Maybe the hunters you know don't mind walking through clear cut forests and shooting around oil wells.
Perhaps, the 'misunderstanding' lies within your own understanding........
Being neither, a hunter or a tree hugger.......I see a balance.
Could a teacher not respect students?..........you get my drift......
Does the outdoorsman need the government to tell him ( or her) that without woods, there are no deer, elk, large cat etc....
While there are those, who do say, the 'spotted owl' takes second seat to the needs of man..........they have a sense of balance.
Every issue is not reduced to political affiliation.
Mr. Shaw...This is my reality. Almost evey hunter I know is a Republican who can't stand people saving the enviroment and almost evey Republican I know that doesn't hunt can't stand people that save the enviroment. I didn't say all hunters are Republicans just the ones in know.
That's not being prejudiced it's just the way the numbers work out in my reality.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.