Because of your comment "At least they were white".
I don't like Obama but that is just an absurd comparison, Obama hasn't murdered millions of his own citizens.
You must have been asleep in history class, because there is no comparison. Why not learn what you missed before asking these kind of idiotic questions.
With O'blunder, it has always been about race, it is the only card in their deck...
Because of your past posts indicate that you are a racist no matter what you use as an excuse for denigrating Obama. Comparing Obama to Stalin or tler means that your are both ignorant and prejudiced.
We know you're a racist, paul. But not because of this. This just makes you look like a moron.
Dude, you called Obama an African monkey in one of these answers. Don't play the 'im not racist' card on me.
I wouldn't call you a racist for that reason alone. However, it is a reason I would call you ignorant. MORE: I infer from your Additional Details that you are conceding your ignorance.
It doesn't make you racist, not necessarily; it just makes you woefully ignorant.
Well, I don't like Obama but he isn't anything like Besides, you said he was an African monkey and "atleast they were white". The "african monkey" is racist though.
Simple. Do as the liberals say but not as they do. If you disagree with their way of thinking you are a racist.
I'm not all that sure anybody ever said it's 'racist' to compare Obama to Stalin or We say it's racist to suggest he is not a citizen or is somehow otherwise 'alien' and I suppose that can translate to some extent to comparing him to Stalin or I don't think anybody said comparing him to Stalin or tler in and of itself in isolation is 'racist' so I think you're blowing that out of proportion. If anyone is calling you racist when you compare Obama to Stalin or I think it is most likely they are leaping to that conclusion based on your overall tone and hostility, not necessarily ONLY because you made the comparison. (Calling him 'socialist' is also another form of 'alien' status that is inspired by racism because the allegation is irrefutably preposterous and the intent is to dehumanize or otherwise identify him as 'inferior'.) Sorry if you don't like that answer but it's true, pal.
The reason is because all of the restrictions on civil liberties an extensions of executive power which Obama carries out began under George W. Bush. Obama continues them, no doubt, and is not protecting civil liberties.
However, when George W. Bush did them, the conservatives defended these policies. However, as soon as Obama carried out the same policies, he was compared to Its a double standard.It seems to conservatives oppression and authoritarianism are okay if they come from white presidents.
I do not necessarily agree that it all stems from racism, but the double standard is certainly there. The clip below shows the conservative response to anyone who criticized Bush. Now Obama is .
Obama's ancestors were kept at slaves, we must be nice to him or we are guilty of the racist notions of our forefathers.
Yes. They call me racist if I call Michelle a horse-face.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.