Why does the governent allow diplomatic immunity when many of these officials can literally get away with anything?

Similar Questions: governent diplomatic immunity officials literally Recent Questions About: governent diplomatic immunity officials literally.

Because abuse of diplomatic immunity creates precisely the kind of international crisis the diplomatic immunity is intended to resolve. Diplomats aren't sent for fun. They're there to work.

They are messengers from foreign governments, keeping communications open, solving disputes before they turn into incidents. They're given "immunity" so that they don't become political prisoners or hostages on trumped-up charges. There are potentials for abuse on both sides, and that's the point: everybody acts like adults, and everybody gets on fine.

Every once in a while it breaks down; a diplomat commits a crime and has to be expelled since they can't be tried. But that is an international embarrassment, and they have to answer to their home government. It's not perfect, but it solves more problems than it creates.

It means each government is responsible for its "diplomats. " So no matter what happens, our government will know what happened and if the person should be rewarded or punished. Very few get away with anything.

If that were a person's intention, they would have a better chance doing crime in their own country where they know the "ropes. "It looks like Pakistan wants an incident where they "stand up" to the evil USA. Which is strange behavior from an "ally.

"Better let India lose and take over the entire area. At least they have a functioning economy.

It's more to protect our diplomats overseas so they don't get arrested on trumped up charges, and create an international incident.

It's quid pro quo. If we could arrest a diplomat here, then they there could arrest OUR diplomat. The whole problem with the Iranian revolution kidnapping our government diplomatic workers is that was--technically--an act of war which President Carter should have responded to with troops and city bombing and the clear statement that if even one worker was hurt, there'd be hell to pay .

. And then death. The reason they were released on Reagan's inauguration is that Reagan had made clear that was pretty much what he was going to do.

If we have a problem with a diplomat here, we send him back to his scummy country and tell them to send us someone reliable.

What are the rules and act in south africa regarding diplomatic immunity.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.