Why doesn't the government do to PETA what they did to the Branch Davidians in El Paso?

In other words, PETA is not a organization that engages in illegal activities. Therefore, there is no reason for the government to shut them down PETA and the Branch Dividians That is a very difficult question to answer. The Branch Dividian part is easy, though, so I'll answer it first.

Keep in mind that this is just my opinion, though. I have no proof. I believe, although it appeared that the Branch Dividians were harmless and pretty much kept to themselves, they apparently had a huge arsenal of weapons.

I believe the governtment took the action they did because of the weapons The part about PETA is a lot more complicated politically. The uncomplicated answer is that PETA is serving some purpose that the government or others in power want to have accomplished. It is widely known that PETA uses methods that are against the law and that they have been referred to as terrorists within government circles, so it would only make sense that the government would limit them or shut them down.

Yet, they don't. The only conclusion I can come to is the one I stated: PETA serves a purpose that helps to bring about certain results that the powers that be want Deb.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.