Why don't they release the 9/11 footage of the plane crashing into the Pentagon?

It's because what you'd see on those films would not match the government story. Fortunately we know this from what happened in New York. There were so many videos and witnesses that are contradictory that the government story did not fly.

See what I mean: Please watch this first video linked here. It’s only one minute. You’re going to be impressed.

This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long.

Go ahead and watch this here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMg... (YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide) Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, “wait, this doesn’t fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.” True.

This is just one piece of evidence, but it’s a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didn’t see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?

The government has promoted a “theory” that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Let’s continue and look at other evidence.

Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out.

Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in it’s own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved.

Watch his account here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a... (YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age – more hits when “dead age” excluded) Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, “Hold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there?

There has got to be another explanation.” True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions.

Again, you didn't see Barry’s testimony on TV. William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above.

His story begins at 9:31 here: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=... (Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez) Now, let’s look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives.

Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the “voice of reason” during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic.

He reported his detailed findings here in Boston: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston.

All of them have been made public. The only reason this silly conspiracy theory favorite even got to take root was because the footage from gas stations and what not were private property, and the government can't just come in and take it....they all eventually were brought to public view, however. These cameras were those designed to show break ins, stuff perpetrated by humans on foot...not planes travelling at 550 mph.

It's just not something you plan for...sorry... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7Aa... Everything about the pentagon crash is consistent with a jetliner impact....everything. If the footage available is grainy.....so what? It doesn't automatically mean that they're hiding some hollywood quality film of the event....which is what you seem to be asking for ( you'll be disappointed....the security cameras aren't that high quality....they still aren't....what's your point here?) The government can't provide what doesn't exist, even with the illuminati and Reptillian Alien ties you _know_ they have.

X D Here's the section of Screwloose Change (the over 2 hour point by point debunking of _everything_ in the film Loose Change) that deals specifically with the Pentagon attack... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXSJYRH5t... Consider...just for a moment...that all we do have is blurry security cams....just...please...consider that--does the other evidence somehow not speak for itself? The parts found at the crash site? The hole in the pentagon being _ENTIRELY_ consistent with an impact by that same type of jet?

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.