Why will Ron Paul have a difficult time winning the republican nomination to run for president?

It not only violated the Constitution and reduced individual liberty; it also failed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racial harmony and a color-blind society. Federal bureaucrats and judges cannot read minds to see if actions are motivated by racism. Therefore, the only way the federal government could ensure an employer was not violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was to ensure that the racial composition of a business's workforce matched the racial composition of a bureaucrat or judge's defined body of potential employees.

Thus, bureaucrats began forcing employers to hire by racial quota. Racial quotas have not contributed to racial harmony or advanced the goal of a color-blind society. Instead, these quotas encouraged racial balkanization, and fostered racial strife.

I think this is just opinion, and I don't presume that he'll be able to do much about repealing it, nor do I think he will ever try to. It really amazes how so many drones will now come out and speak against the Civil Rights Act of 1964! Where were these people before Ron or Rand Paul ever made these statements.

It's fair to have an opinion, even if it's a pathetic one, but to take a strong stance on something you never had a strong stance on before because some politician tells you what he thinks, is preposterous.

Both the elderly bigot and his wimpy son Rand would have opposed it.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.