Fortunately, Wikipedia records every individual edit to every page with a timestamp.
Fortunately, Wikipedia records every individual edit to every page with a timestamp. You'll probably only have to consider the "User talk" namespace, as the majority of barnstars are given by being posted on the awardee's talk page. And you can probably also ignore edits to IP users' talk pages and talk pages of editors with few edits, as those editors are unlikely to have received barnstars.It's also possible that you can identify from the edit summaries further edits to exclude.
If you can identify only a few thousand revisions that actually need to be retrieved, you could probably get away with using the API to download those revisions; if there are many revisions, or you expect you might want a wider sample, you'd be better served to download a database dump and process the revisions offline.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.