It ended up ending slavery, one of the most important changes in our country's history. Yet, I heard that the original big issue was state's rights: the north wanted to unite the country more tightly by limiting state's rights, and the south were strongly for them. I find it interesting that today, so many Republicans are strongly pro state's rights, the same position that allowed for slavery in the first place.
I would ask how he felt about being the first president to have his inauguration to be recorded with video. I would have asked what impact he felt yellow journalism had on his decision to go to war. I would ask him if he felt American imperialism betrayed the ideals of American democracy.
President McKinley, poor man. He was a good man by all accounts, even if not a perfect president. And although I don't personally agree with his expansionist philosophies, you did a lot of good to help America prosper and really had Americans' best interests at heart.
So sad he was assassinated. Here are my questions for him: Why elevate Sen. Sherman to the State Department?
And was he really senile? How senile are we talking? How well could he really function in his post?
Honestly? It's just me and you here talkin'... If your presidency had continued indefinitely, what other countries or territories would you have like to annex?
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.