No stem cells have a very short shlef life. So it uis a question of whether medical waste should be used for therapy and not a prolife issue. Although I appreciate the politicians lying or being ignorant to a scientific fact and lying to everyone to make a debate.JT.
I think it would DJProfessorK. I've heard people say tha there's never been such a gulf between the parties. Lots of these people hate each other, they don't interact socially or ever.It can't be healthy for the political process to see each other as enemies in politics and in life.
JT Walters...clarify. I think you answered the wrong question.
Agape Press, July 29, 2004: Dr. John Kilner, president of the Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity (CBHD), is criticizing Ron Reagan, Jr.'s stance on embryonic stem-cell research (ESCR) and so-called therapeutic cloning as both misinformed and misleading. Kilner says history is littered with similarly misguided attempts "to relieve suffering by cutting ethical corners," but in the case of ESCR, he points out that it is not only unadvisable to do so -- it is unnecessary. The Center's president notes, "All that Ron Reagan advocated can be achieved through adult stem-cell research.
But he amazingly never mentioned adult stem cells. Instead, his misleading language covered up the fact that producing the cells he seeks requires cloning human beings and then destroying them." But Kilner insists, "Cloning and killing are too high an ethical price to pay, particularly when there is another safe way to develop the same cures."
Daniel McConchie, director of public relations at the CBHD, points out that the U.S. government is spending around $28 million this year on ESCR, and the administration is proposing to add $18 million to that. He says more money would be better spent on adult stem-cell research, where 45 diseases are currently being treated, and new treatments are forthcoming.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.