Would you walk through a desert all alone with snakes and bugs all around and very little water to be rewarded?

Only a liberal could see any logic in the term "subjective concept" It is a prima facie oxymoron. As a matter of fact. I gave you a star because I think subjectivism is the hallmark of liberalism.

All truths are subject to redefinition. There are no absolutes. Of course, when absolutes don't exist, neither does truth.

It's therefore easy to tell lies people will believe. They believe a dollar of "profit" is a dollar of "theft" so it. S OK for them to take the dollar and give it to someone else.

The liberals don't even see it as punishing success. They see is as justified retribution for the rich exploiting the poor. Liberals/progressives/Communists/social... all rely on subjectivism for their daily sustenance Any system that punishes success and rewards failure will acquire failure.

It is an economic fact. Societies will always produce more of what they pay for. Those who are capable of success will take what they have and move.

They will simply vote with their feet. Liberty is a fundamental yearning of the human spirit and socialism will build walls to keep people inside. This is why Statists always have to break the spirit to enslave the population.

When you teach people they can only be equal when they are slaves to the state, then you add a hefty dose of envy, you have the makings of subjectivism. Each society on earth created a set of values. The ones which lasted longest, were the ones which upheld the best moral character.

As the society grew lax in it's morals due to affluence complacency or decadence, the society failed. Those societies which didn't fight for liberty died as slaves. Throughout history, the conquerors of other nations grew weak, when they enslaved others instead of doing their own work.

Theft, sexual amorality, decadence, sloth, and all the other "sins" of immorality, came to play to degrade and weaken societies who employed them. All liberal thought, policy, values and beliefs are based on specific, fundamental, and very alluring lies. All liberal rhetoric is justification of those lies.

There are no exceptions. In every case, the lies enable liberals to justify some sort of immoral behavior. Liberals, have used language to their advantage, spinning the truth to the point where any form of depravity can be condoned.

I doubt true liberals want successful, industrious societies. They want easy comforts. They want easy guiltless access to vice.

You can see from most liberal answers here on YA, they detest talk of moral values and absolute negative truth of the outcomes of their behavior.

It already take two private sector to pay for one government employee (actually 3, but those taxes (paid in from the paid out) cancel each-other out). Slow death, and not really that slow, just not instantaneous. Greece-like.

Reward for the unworthy (participation trophies), nets nothing but resentment from those who try, and a future of why bother. Stagnation, and then a race to the bottom. You can't remove competition, it only changes the definition of what wins into being the biggest loser.

Excellent points from Bek It's monumentally naive to believe that if the world's assets were "divided" up equally, that they'd then remain exactly that way forever. Examine the "fortunate" such as in Hollywood, Lotto winners, Wall Street Moguls, Sports Stars, Rock & Rollers etc. (who had it all). Do they remain so?

You really have to have a screw loose to think so. Dividing up equally would have to be done "hourly" (there's no end to it). No rewards, No growth, No consequences, No ambition, No advancement, No point.

... and when there's "nothing" to divide, what will "equal" be worth?

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.