WWE Summerslam: Who forgot Jerry 'The King' Lawler was on Commentary during Randy Orton Vs. Sheamus?

I quite agree, Triple H as HOF worthy a career he has had made his name based on the mega push because of who he is, if Triple H had not got together with Stephanie, he would have had nowhere near the pushes and success he has had. I think Triple H is not just good he is very good and one of the best heels of the modern era but I agree with Bret when he says not great, there are many more wrestlers over the years that have wowed me much more in the ring than Triple H has. The same can be said of Hulk Hogan , legendary figure in wrestling and HOF worthy for probably being the most recognisable superstar ever but again there was guys that blew Hogan away in the ring.

Some stars become legends for their character and their pushes, some become legends for their work rate. It's all good at the end of the day because you need that mix to make a good wrestling show.

I agree with him that Triple H is good but not great. He never had much of a gimmick and he didn't really stand out. I know I say that a lot but I think it's true.

He was just a long-haired dude in trunks to me. However, I disagree with Triple H never putting on a good match. He put on great matches against Undertaker, The Rock, Stone Cold, and Shawn Michaels.

Bret Hart, in my opinion, was great himself at the in-ring psychology, move selling, but not much else. No offense to him though.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.