A question about Global Warming and research funding?

"Hobbes not Locke Socrates not Plato Rand not Marx Darwin not Disney" This cracks me up. The Hobbes-Locke opinion seems to contradict your Rand-Marx opinion. And Socrates?

It's not even clear if the man existed except maybe as an allegory. If you're a top contributor in Philosophy, may God have mercy on that entire section. (Oops!

Did I just lose government funding for invoking the name of God?) Logic seems to be slightly out of your grasp, as does a cursory understanding of prominent philosophers... EDIT: I thought you were incompetent before. Now it's just that you're crazy. You have the look and feel of someone on a streetcorner, rambling and unshaven, reeking of sewage, holding a cardboard sign "REPENT!

These idiotic statements are made only by people who have never read the published studies. People who read the science are well aware of the scientific basis and the difference between scientific observations and religious faith. Rest assured that every published climate scientist has accepted that man is warming the environment.

The only people who do not believe that are people who are removed from and ignorant of the science. Among climate researchers -- those who actually perform the scientific study rather than depend on uneducated faith, it is absolutely settled and without dispute that man is causing the environment to warm.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.