Anonymity versus credibility, what do you pick?

In my mind, there is a huge difference between an unidentified source and a "credible" source. If you have problems with that comparison, contact Dan Rather, he can explain it to you. The crediblity of your sources ultimately determine your personal credibility or the credibilty of the organization that you work for in reporting the URL1 many ways, credibility is everything and must be guarded as the gold in Ft.

Knox. WB.

Anon of course. Why you think I go by ptosis?

If a whistle blower, then anonymity is the key, much better, as you say, to avoid retribution if identified. The stories can hold credibility if situations are identified to be true and factual.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.