It is quite a simple question, see if you can get your scientific mind round it. The main point is what has one issue got to do with the other? You may want to try and connect them to attempt to discredit some people with whom you disagree but that is not science it is PR.
Lawyers can use similar techniques to sway a jury as well. It works like this:? Divide people into two groups: those you like and those you don't like.? Research the ones you don't like to find the worst lie they ever told.? Research the ones you do like to find the most honest thing they have ever said.? Use the results to try and persuade people that the people you don't like are all dishonest and the people you like are very honest.
You don't have to use honesty as your area of research, any two good/bad issues will work. You just need to make sure that no research is done on the "good" people about "bad" things and vice versa. That is why the IPCC had a charter to research man-made global warming, only.
No-one is fooled - well, apart from you, obviously.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.