3 It depends on where you are, and who the recipient is. Since organ recipients would generally die without an organ, they're usually willing to accept just about anything that's viable. In Hong Kong there was an experiment with NO exclusion criteria, and it did increase lifespans, but it didn't become public policy.
HIV will generally get you excluded; so will malignant cancers. Beyond that doctors make decisions on a case-by-case basis as to what organs are likely to extend the life spans of the recipients. Some organ transplants are expected to last for decades; others are only going to give a few extra years of life anyway and if the disease you get kills you more slowly than that...For organs that are expected to last for a long time (kidney, heart, liver) there is a more stringent list of exclusion criteria:mohanfoundation.org/inclusion_exclusion_... .
Since organ recipients would generally die without an organ, they're usually willing to accept just about anything that's viable.In Hong Kong there was an experiment with NO exclusion criteria, and it did increase lifespans, but it didn't become public policy. HIV will generally get you excluded; so will malignant cancers. Beyond that doctors make decisions on a case-by-case basis as to what organs are likely to extend the life spans of the recipients.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.