No. The IRS did not have these employees in mind when it wrote the Rev. Proc. I know that the literal wording of the Rev. Proc.
Implies that temps are Worksite Employees, but that's not the direction the IRS is headed. Therefore, if a PEO has both true temps and "permatemps," the true temps simply should be regarded as common law employees of the PEO (as they almost undoubtedly are), the same as the PEO's back office employees. I believe the PEO can continue to cover its true temps as its common law employees without great concern of IRS challenge, even if the COs for whom those temps provide services do not cosponsor the PEO's plan.
Usually it is easy to tell the difference between a temp on the one hand and a permatemp or employee under a long term arrangement on the other. In a close case, consult with legal counsel. €¢ What is a PEO for purposes of the Rev. Proc?
Notwithstanding my earlier comments on the issue (see Q&A 166), I do not believe the IRS will interpret the Rev. Proc. ... more.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.