One thing that is very different about the spending. Campaign contributions are voluntary and the spending of them goes back into the economy. Government spending comes from our taxes and goes to a lot of places.
It's fair to say that Obama bought the election and he plans to buy the re-election with the help of scum like George Soros. Campaigns should have imposed budgets with upper limits. For example, if you are running for President, you can spend no more than 100 million dollars.
When you reach that point, your spending is over and you reap whatever benefit in terms of vote that your dollars effectively reached. Your opponent has the same limitation so it gets down to skill and talent. Maybe skill and talent are what we need in a president, so why not show it in the election process?
Americans are extremely stupid in this regard and we will probably continue to remain so. WB.
Foreign campaign con-tributions might have something to do with it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_United_States....
Hah! I think that's more of a statement than a questions - Yes. It's pretty disturbing how much money is squandered on campaign fundraising when voters can really make decisions on who they will vote for based off of aired debates and appearances.
I think Obama should donate much of his campaign money (75%) to charity - would definitely send a good message!
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.