Six studies were identified that addressed the effectiveness of an MRI scoring system for ischemic stroke. One multiple prospective cohort study8 and one single prospective cohort study,9 published in 2002 and 2003, were included in our review. Three non comparative case series reports10-12and one case study were excluded for level of evidence.13 Neither of the included studies used MRI measures prospectively to make decisions on thrombolysis.
Both, however, provided correlations with surrogate measures which may be useful in clinical decision making. Recanalisation and initial DWI lesions were found to correlate with clinical outcome and infarct volume at 60 days. In addition, in patients treated with intravenous tPA, time to peak was correlated with recanalisation at day 1.
Thirteen of 15 patients (93%) whose baseline time-to-peak was less than or equal to 36.9 milliseconds recanalized within the first day versus 5 of 15 patients (35.7%) whose time-to-peak was greater than 36.9 ... more.
Prospective evaluation of CT scoring systems was not available, and both included studies are evaluations of CT's conducted during the course of prospective trials of thrombolysis in stroke. Barber and colleagues256 evaluated 203 consecutive patients treated with thrombolytic therapy within 3-hours of prospective scoring of their CT scans according to a 10-point scale based on an unenhanced axial CT scan. The value was calculated from two cuts within the MCA territory.
A normal scan obtained a score of 10 points with one point subtracted for each area of early ischemic change. The ASPECTS Score correlated with baseline NIH Stroke Scale Score in an inverse manner (Spearman's rho = -0.56, p With dependence defined as a Rankin Score of 3 to 5, the odds ratio for good functional outcome was 82 (95% CI 23–290). Similarly, an ASPECTS Score of less than or equal to 7 was predictive of the presence ... more.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.