Incorrect, That is Theistic Evolution, For those who hold to the Bible as the word of God, theistic evolution should not be a viable option. The Bible says, "Know that the LORD is God. It is he who made us..." (Psalm 100:3).
The Scriptures state that God created. God said, "Let there be..." and there was. The Scriptures speak of the creative word of God.
When God speaks, it occurs. He said "Let there be" and it was so. It does not say, "Let there be a slow development through an evolutionary process."
God said in Genesis 1:26, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground." The Hebrew word for "make" in this verse, and in verse 25 where God makes the beasts, is "asah." It means to do, work, make, produce.
This is not simply the limited Hebrew understanding of evolutionary principles. The land animals were made differently than man. The animals were made from the ground, but man was made directly by God: "the LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being" (Gen.
2:7). Evolution states that man evolved from life forms that developed in the ocean. Here, God made man from the dust of the ground--not the water of the ocean.
If evolution is true and the Bible is true, then how is the formation of Eve explained? She was created out of one of Adam's ribs (Gen. 2:22).
There is no way to explain this if theistic evolution is true; that is, unless you want to say that Eve wasn't made from Adam's side. Then, if you do that, you are doubting the very word of God. Also, Jesus said in Mark 10:6 "But at the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.'" The beginning was not evolutionary slime; in the beginning of creation there was Adam and Eve.
Though this information is brief and far from complete, it should be obvious that theistic evolution and the Scriptures cannot be harmonized. Also, the Genesis account clearly says that birds were created with sea creatures on day five while land animals were not created until day six. This is in direct opposition to the Darwinian view that birds evolved from land animals.
The biblical account says that birds preceded land animals. The theistic evolutionist view says exactly the opposite. One of the most unfortunate trends in modern Christianity is that of reinterpreting Genesis to accommodate evolutionary theories.
Many well-known Bible teachers and apologists have caved in to the evolutionists and have come to believe that adhering to a literal interpretation of Genesis is somehow detrimental to the credibility of Christians. If anything, evolutionists lose respect for those whose belief in the Bible is so tenuous that they are willing to quickly compromise it. Although the number of true creationists may be dwindling in academia, several faithful organizations such as Answers in Genesis, the Creation Research Society, and the Institute for Creation Research have affirmed that the Bible is not only compatible with real science, but affirm that not a single word in the Bible has ever been disproved by true science.
The Bible is God’s living Word, given to us by the Creator of the universe, and His description of how He created that universe is not compatible with the theory of evolution, even a “theistic” understanding of evolution. The Battle for the Beginning By: John MacArthur http://www.christianbook.com/the-battle-...
No you are wrong there is no evidence for the evolution mythology except for what science created its self there is no evidence for the age of the earth it is a lie http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.htm... So far scientists have not found a way to determine the exact age of the Earth directly from Earth rocks because Earth's oldest rocks have been recycled and destroyed by the process of plate tectonics. If there are any of Earth's primordial rocks left in their original state, they have not yet been found. Nevertheless, scientists have been able to determine the probable age of the Solar System and to calculate an age for the Earth by assuming that the Earth and the rest of the solid bodies in the Solar System formed at the same time and are, therefore, of the same age a assumption is not a fact it is a guess in light they had no physical evidence to look at so no it is not proven the earth is that old.
More created mythology by science no assumptions are never considered fact except in evolution theory any one else were to make a assumption they would be shot down as not true you even have the creation wrong it seems you can not read either on day 1 god had the water and earth already formed and made. KJV: Genesis 1:5. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.
And the evening and the morning were the first day. God starts the rotation of the earth on its 24 hour rotation on its axis the light he commanded was called day or day time the darkness he called night time. The first 24 hour day was completed.
God starts the earth rotating not what you proclaim next day 2 god creates the atmosphere on earth he puts a large amount of water up in the earths atmosphere to have a water canopy around the world which causes the earth to be tropical all over the globe day 3 the ground already there he allows the land to rise up out of the ocean that covers the earth there was no evolution nor was their a big bang.
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.