Do you still use a camera that has film and has to be developed or have you went completely to a digital camera? What are your reasons?

No, I no longer use the camera with film and completely changed it to digicam. I gave my old camera that uses film to my cousin who wants it for his collection. My husband and I decided to switch to using digicam because of practical reasons.

First, digicam is more convenient and inexpensive. We just charge the batteries so we don't need to buy one. Second, we don't need to buy film every time and we are not limited to 12 or 36 shots.

Third, my husband and I prefer to have our digital scrapbook with still pictures and video clips. Fourth reason is that digicam is not limited to still pictures unlike the camera with film because we can take videos too. It also help us create a movie out of the videos we have taken and it makes our scrapbooking experience more interesting and fun.

I've gone completely to a digital camera -- it's nothing fancy, but it's nothing involving film. There are two main reasons for this: - Buying film is really inconvenient and costly. I always hated doing it, and ended up using the cheap disposable cameras to avoid it.

- I share most of my pictures online, and it's a lot easier to transfer pictures from a digital camera with a USB cable than to get photos developed, scanned and transferred. I don't think I even have a scanner. Honestly, I can't imagine putting all my physical developed photos online.

Film cameras are on their way out most places, too. News outlets rarely use them anymore. Professional photographers generally don't.So I don't feel too bad following their lead.

I held on to an old 35mm SLR film camera that I had up until 2 years ago. I hung on to it partly out of sentimental reasons and for the picture quality that one gets from an SLR. That camera was the first truly expensive thing that I saved up for and purchased on my own when I was 15.It gave me 12 years of wonderful memory capturing service, but the practicality and convenience of digital overtook all of that for me 2 years ago.

Now, even an inexpensive, entry-level digital camera offers incredible quality.

About 20 years ago, I spent $400 on a Canon EOS Rebel, the first incarnation, not digital. About 6 years later, it stopped working. I never got it fixed, because I didn't have the money.

Now I have a small Fuji digital that takes better pictures, is easier to carry around, and I can crop the pictures and save them to disk and have them printed out any way I like. My Canon EOS sits in my closet, unused, still broken. I'm seriously thinking of seeing if anyone at the local community college knows a student who might be willing to get it fixed and use it.It's a good camera, but my digital is just so much easier.

I just bought a 3 gig disk for the digital, so I can take pics forever before I download them. Believe it or not, I still have some disposable cameras sitting around here that need to be developed.

I do not use the old-style cameras with film in them any longer, since I have switched over to digital cameras almost 10 years ago. I no longer own a camera that accommodates the film rolls and would not necessarily invest in another such camera today, since there is simply no reason to do so. The overall convenience of digital cameras, including memory cards, rechargeable batteries, and the ability to download and print photos by yourself or take them to the store to have them professionally printed greatly outweighs what an old-style camera has to offer.

I have found during our most recent move, one of my old, undeveloped film rolls from about 11 years ago. It would have contained some more of the photos from my first son’s birth. Unfortunately, it was expired and could no longer be developed.

I have gone to the digital camera as with my Sony credit card I got the Cybershot 12.1 for free with the points. I only use the disposable in my vehicles in case of an accident or I need something fast as I don't have to keep the battery charged when not in use and I don't carry around the digital.

A result is that at the two ends of the spectrum both high end professional cameras and low end consumer models tend to use lithium ion batteries. When digital cameras became common, a question many photographers asked was whether their film cameras could be converted to digital. The answer was yes and no.

For the majority of 35 mm film cameras the answer is no, the reworking and cost would be too great, especially as lenses have been evolving as well as cameras. For most a conversion to digital, to give enough space for the electronics and allow a liquid crystal display to preview, would require removing the back of the camera and replacing it with a custom built digital unit. Many early professional SLR cameras, such as the Kodak DCS series, were developed from 35 mm film cameras.

The technology of the time, however, meant that rather than being digital "backs" the bodies of these cameras were mounted on large, bulky digital units, often bigger than the camera portion itself. These were factory built cameras, however, not aftermarket conversions. A notable exception is the Nikon E2, followed by Nikon E3, using additional optics to convert the 35mm format to a 2/3 CCD-sensor.

A few 35 mm cameras have had digital camera backs made by their manufacturer, Leica being a notable example. Medium format and large format cameras (those using film stock greater than 35 mm), have a low unit production, and typical digital backs for them cost over $10,000. These cameras also tend to be highly modular, with handgrips, film backs, winders, and lenses available separately to fit various needs.

The very large sensor these backs use leads to enormous image sizes. For example Phase One's P45 39 MP image back creates a single TIFF image of size up to 224.6 MB, and even greater pixel counts are available. Medium format digitals such as this are geared more towards studio and portrait photography than their smaller DSLR counterparts; the ISO speed in particular tends to have a maximum of 400, versus 6400 for some DSLR cameras.

In the industrial and high-end professional photography market, some camera systems use modular (removable) image sensors. For example, some medium format SLR cameras, such as the Mamiya 645D series, allow installation of either a digital camera back or a traditional photographic film back. Linear array cameras are also called scan backs.

Most earlier digital camera backs used linear array sensors, moving vertically to digitize the image. Many of them only capture grayscale images. The relatively long expsoure times, in the range of seconds or even minutes generally limit scan backs to studio applications, where all aspects of the photographic scene are under the photographer's control.

Some other camera backs use CCD arrays similar to typical cameras. These are called single-shot backs. Since it is much easier to manufacture a high-quality linear CCD array with only thousands of pixels than a CCD matrix with millions, very high resolution linear CCD camera backs were available much earlier than their CCD matrix counterparts.

For example, you could buy an (albeit expensive) camera back with over 7,000 pixel horizontal resolution in the mid-1990s. However, as of 2004update, it is still difficult to buy a comparable CCD matrix camera of the same resolution. Rotating line cameras, with about 10,000 color pixels in its sensor line, are able, as of 2005update, to capture about 120,000 lines during one full 360 degree rotation, thereby creating a single digital image of 1,200 Megapixels.

Most modern digital camera backs use CCD or CMOS matrix sensors. The matrix sensor captures the entire image frame at once, instead of incrementing scanning the frame area through the prolonged exposure. For example, Phase One produces a 39 million pixel digital camera back with a 49.1 x 36.8 mm CCD in 2008.

This CCD array is a little smaller than a frame of 120 film and much larger than a 35 mm frame (36 x 24 mm). In comparison, consumer digital cameras use arrays ranging from 36 x 24 mm (full frame on high end consumer DSLRs) to 7.2 x 5.3 mm (on point and shoot cameras) CMOS sensor. Relatively few complete digital SLR cameras have sensors large enough to compete (except by image stitching) with the image detail offered by medium to large format film cameras.

Phase One, Mamiya, and Hasselblad in 2011 manufacture medium format digital devices that can capture 30MP up to 80MP. These large and expensive cameras, having high build quality and few moving parts, tend to be long lasting and are prominent on the used market.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.

Related Questions