Do you think President Barack Obama would be invited to Prince William's wedding, if he is white?

The reason why President Obama was not invited to the wedding of Their Royal ghnesses The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, was that it was a royal occasion, rather than a state occasion, consequently the guest list had a more personal flavour, than the 1981 wedding of The Prince of Wales, which was a state wedding.

The wedding was paid for by the respective families, and they invited their own guests, which in the bridegroom's case would have included a certain amount of royals, as they would have been either relatives, or friends. Barack Obama was not snubbed. There were no presidents invited from anywhere, unless they were personal friends of the couple.

I feel your grasp of history is very tenous, when you make vague allegations about our Royal family being historically rascist. Perhaps you should research Queen Victoria and The Munshi. If you are American, you come from a country where rascism was institutionalised until the nineteen sixties, and you can scarcely afford to "throw stones".

As an Asian, my understanding towards British monarchy, from our perspective, is they are sinful. Considering most of what they believe in are sinful in Asian ideology In Asia, since as far back as history can record (5000years ago), believe a nation is common property of the people, therefore policy must be set in public interest, this ideology was furture reinforce by Confouscious ideology, while talking about the ethic of a King's rule, saying the King must respect the fact that the nation is common property of all and therefore the King is a public servent and should rule in public interest. (It is also one of the reason, why democracy spread like wild fire, after it was introduce to the east) In prior to introducing democratic goverment structure, rulers (Emperors) who failed to rule in public interest are remove from office, if able via legal mean, if not, by force.(e.g. Revolt) When an Emperor is removed by force, the new Emperor the people choose, usually have no blood tie to the previous royal family.

We also believe what is relevant to determine if a person is better then another, is determine by a his/her action. Race, religion, royality or even if he is a king, is irrelevant, as a result, unlike in the west, marriage between royal and none royal is the norm. Kings usually insist for Princess to marrie upper class, but not necessary royality, Princess frequently marry senator or knights or their children or grand children, otherwise respect scholars, wealthy businessman's family and sometime royalty of another nation.

Prince marrie woman of all class, historically very few Asian Queens came from a royal family and Queen born from a working class family, are common.

So you can see why from Eastern point of view, many ways of Britsh royals historically, can be seen as sinful. E.g. 'divin right of the king", "king is god's given right", "royals to better then none royals simply because they are royals"(How dare they!

Jesus' head apprentice Peter isn't royal, are the royals better then him, too? ), refer to royal and none royal relationship as "royal and commeners", royal and none royal should not wed. While Gen Y royals are normal, these sinful believe still have some hold over older royals, as a result, I won't be suprise if they are historically racist too, especially considering many western nation once have slave trade of black.

(Example that support these sin still might have a hold over older royals, include the fact they still insist for us to refer to them as "Your royal highness" and can't forget the word "royal" in it. Political figure have title too "usually is your honor or your excellency" but apart from former document or in court, we do not refer to them that way. The only royals who don't insist for people to refer to them as "Your highness" are gen Y royals).

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.