Gun trade options? Trade or no?

My problem starts with you targeting Charles. After CJ, your RB corps is weak, but there's a big problem with Charles that has nothing to do with his health. You'll note the other guy has Hillis, and there's a reason for that.

Even Charles himself has said that this will be a timeshare, and Hillis looks great so far. When teams bring in a top free agent at RB (Michael Bush is the other one with the Bears) the starting RB loses a lot of value. And this applies to Charles.

So I don't think you should trade. Jackson is startable, and McGahee is the clearcut #1 guy in Denver. Your other RBs aren't going to interest this other guy.

Why would he want Gore or Bush? They're both part of timeshares, and Bush isn't even the #1. And your other problem is you have almost nothing at WR.

Nicks and AJ Green are great starters, but you can't afford to lose them with only Nate Washington on the bench. Your team doesn't look that bad right now. Alex Smith and the b/u TE were wasted picks.

You need depth at WR. But otherwise, you'll give up too much to get Charles, who you probably don't need.

I would offer Gore, Nicks, and Bears D/ST for Charles, S. Johnson, Seahawks D/ST if you really want him..If the guy is stupid maybe you can give him Jackson,Green, Bears D/ST for same package.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.