Holder Begs Court to Stop Document Release on Fast and Furious?

Because he's "Dirty". Not just for doing it, but for having meetings as to how to cover up their complicity in it after it became clear they were caught, and after they were subpoenaed for the documents. It's fun watching cornered rats, hiss & spit, eh?

The end is near, and they're all out of BS. Please ask about this in the debates ... that will be delicious. They could've done this immediately if it was that important, so why the stall?

And if it was Bush's program, why are they protecting Bush?

Here's some more input to your objective analysis: GW Bush exerted Executive Privilege 6 times over similar documents within his Administration. Here are some examples: : Bush invoked executive privilege "in substance" in refusing to disclose the details of Vice President Dick Cheney's meetings with energy executives, which was not appealed by the GAO. In a separate Supreme Court decision in 2004, however, Justice Anthony Kennedy noted "Executive privilege is an extraordinary assertion of power 'not to be lightly invoked.' United States v.

Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, 7 (1953). On July 9, 2007, Bush again invoked executive privilege to block a congressional subpoena requiring the testimonies of Taylor and Miers. On July 25, 2007, the House Judiciary Committee voted to cite Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten forcontempt of Congress.

On July 13, less than a week after claiming executive privilege for Miers and Taylor, Counsel Fielding effectively claimed the privilege once again, this time in relation to documents related to the 2004 death of Army Ranger Pat Tillman. In a letter to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Fielding claimed certain papers relating to discussion of the friendly-fire shooting “implicate Executive Branch confidentiality interests” and would therefore not be turned over to the committee. On August 1, 2007, Bush invoked the privilege for the fourth time in little over a month, this time rejecting a subpoena for Karl Rove.

The subpoena would have required the President's Senior Advisor to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee in a probe over fired federal prosecutors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_p...

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.