How do you tell if a person has real hope (as opposed to false hope)?

I don't get it either. It's usually just emotional, personal, and fallacious god arguments, so they shouldn't be taken seriously as logical or fair explanations. Completely (pro-life) means absence of choice / decision making.

Pro-lifers, that hypocritically argue I am PRO-LIFE with the exception of rape and incest, are still pro-choice. Arguments from ''potentiality'' if X is conceived, X has potential to continue to personhood, yet if X is not conceived, there is no potentiality for X to proceed to personhood. But (all) are reproductive cells from reproductive organs with same X potentiality.

That's just part of it. Please ignore the ''pro-life'' trolls. When it comes to the well-fair of the public and on the basis of ethics, I find the pro-life stance LESS ethical than the pro-choice stance; this not mean I find ''abortion'' itself an ethical practice.

There are various conflicting holes in their arguments. Let me address the argument that: - Complete banning of abortions; since humans can only suffer while alive; its unethical to bring an (already) suffering child (since they are persons from conception), to full cognitive potential to experience suffering WORSE, then die. Since there is no ''suffering'' in death, I don't see how 'being dead' would be worse that 'suffering more'.

It doesn't click with me. It IS though, ethical to enable choice (decision making) to either be pro-life OR pro-choice, and by being pro-choice, I automatically support women bringing a disabled child to term as well, however unethical it may be. - I also support no arguments on the basis of Theism.

- Also, to address the ''men have less rights'', which it comes to abortion so lets BAN abortion. No, that removes the rights and choices of women AND any the men had, it makes more since from my POV, to enable MORE rights and choices to men for women. - Also, since the 'unborn' child does not have PNS reflexes: it is not eligible for personhood; which as a legal prohibition does not equate to murder.

(Killing of a defenseless person). This does not mean I dismiss this as an act of killing; but it is not murder. - Also to address, that ''pro-choice'' is pro-abortion and anti-adoption; which is false and fallacious, since pro-choice enables all choice-making.....

It is because after the sperm yokes to the egg, it is life, an egg is just a cell which is part of you and it is natural for the body to rid itself of the single cell. People however have no right however to kill a human being no matter how young it is, people are slowly saying that the age of the foetus when it can be aborted should be raised, but what is the difference between the baby inside the body and outside the body, it is a human either way. Do you believe in murdering a baby because it is not going to be in a good life or the mother just does not want it?

It is sick and displays the growing immorality facing the western world. Animals in the natural world do not abort their foetus just because they don't want it because they know that it is life that will be born and continue the species, but they do not get pregnant every time they release an ovum, so why should we as humans distance ourselves from the natural world by committing acts like this. Also, it is the woman's choice to abort, but it is not necessarily a choice for an egg not to be fertilised.

The only way abortion is morally acceptable in my view is if not killing the foetus would kill both it and the mother. I see at the bottom you complaining about the religious views on abortion, the reason the religions do not support it because it is immoral, people don't not support it because of religion, my mother is an Atheist and strongly apposes abortion. Please tell me if you disagree with any of that.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.