Bonus Question Similar Questions: Nasa plan reinvent space shuttle Recent Questions About: Nasa plan reinvent space shuttle Miscellaneous > Science News.
Similar Questions: Nasa plan reinvent space shuttle Recent Questions About: Nasa plan reinvent space shuttle.
Nasa plan to reinvent the space shuttle NASA's ambitious design to return humans to the lunar surface has been controversial right from the get-go. It calls for ditching the Space Shuttle entirely and abandoning nearly all of its technology except for the solid rocket boosters and fuel tank. These elements are to be uprated to become core components of the new Ares I crew launch vehicle and massive Ares V cargo rocket.
That's controversial enough with so many billions of dollars sunk into Shuttles, and with so much expertise among NASA's engineers and scientists on this system. But the two new rockets have encountered problem after problem, and the costs of development have spiraled to the $35 billion dollar level. President Obama's even launched an independent review to investigate the entire program.
But there may be hope: NASA appears to be reconsidering the rocket plans at the core of the lunar landing Constellation program. Though officially no change is due, an alternative design is gaining credibility. The first hints of a Plan B came during a June 17 meeting of the independent Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee in Washington.
Speaking to the expert panel, NASA's shuttle program manager, John Shannon, presented a totally different design for the rockets, and did so with NASA's blessing. The new design is a derivation of one that's been knocking around for decades, as part of a suite of "Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicles. " These are intended to reuse lots of the Shuttle's core technology, and that's exactly what Shannon's new rocket does.
It's called the Shuttle-Derived Side-Mount Heavy Launch Vehicle, and if you check out the video you'll see it looks pretty familiar. Sources: http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/kit-eaton/technomix/will-nasa-reinvent-its-lunar-rocket-program .
Counting down to NASA's reinvention Kennedy Space Center, Fla. - Standing close to the launchpad-say, 2.5 miles away at the NASA Press Center here-you're aware of your trouser legs flapping against your shins seconds after the space shuttle blasts off. The predawn launch of the shuttle Endeavour is something to see, but what grabs you is the in-your-bones feel of the launch-being swept up in the sound wave generated by 6.2 million pounds of rocket thrust, the crackling of the solid-rocket boosters.
It's unexpected, and, as the Apollo astronauts said of their even larger rocket, the mighty Saturn V, "very emotional. ""Go at throttle up," says Mission Control in Houston, and the shuttle fades into a shooting star, turning north to sync up its orbit with its target. Things begin to settle down.
It's then that you finally hear the car alarms going off in the VIP parking lot, as if to verify what you have just felt. NASA still puts on one helluva show. But the recent success of the Endeavour's two-week mission to the International Space Station-delivering the last major section, the Tranquility Node, and a new bay window (facing down at Earth, the Italian-built "cupola" was said to have provided the astronauts with views that brought tears to their eyes)-only momentarily diverted attention from the space agency's uncertain future and the trajectory of U.S. human spaceflight.
Indeed, the flight of STS-130 marked the beginning of the end for the nearly 30-year-old space shuttle program, which will wrap up later this year. About 7,000 jobs will be lost along Florida's "Space Coast" when the program ends. Those job losses, and the proposed cancellation of a future moon-rocket program, have set off a political firestorm.
The end of the shuttle program also is forcing NASA managers to rethink fundamental assumptions about the space agency's role. Will it remain a mission-driven "operator" of space craft and launchers? Or will it lease the capabilities for low-Earth orbit missions from commercial vendors, while working with the aerospace industry on new endeavors-such as a heavy-lift booster that could return humans to the moon, or perhaps take them to Mars and the rest of the solar system?
The greater emphasis on commercial launch services is also likely to have an impact on space component vendors, which are already seeing shrinking lead times to deliver parts for space probes. Sources: http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223101670 .
Make it more efficient. " Nasa plans to reinvent the space shuttle by making it more efficient than ever before with new engineering. Sources: my opinion.
Nasa plans to reinvent the space shuttle by making it more efficient than ever before with new engineering.
Looking for a CD of the music NASA sent into space on Voyager. I found a list but I'm looking for them all together. " "Have you ever been to a Space Shuttle launch?
Are they still public? Can you film them? " "when did NASA first start using LED lighttherapy in space?
" "What do you think about people who "reinvent" themselves? " "Do you think the Nasa will ever get a chance to send an astronaut into space to explore the other planets? " "What is the status of the successor program to the space shuttle?
" "After NASA who has the next largest (i.e. Best funded) space program? " "America in Space: NASA'S First 50 Years... Where is this book, and how much?
" "Anyone been to a space shuttle launch? " "This somewhat recently in: NASA has its eye on a new ride - Was the space shuttle cancellation a trade-in?
Looking for a CD of the music NASA sent into space on Voyager. I found a list but I'm looking for them all together.
After NASA who has the next largest (i.e. Best funded) space program?
I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.