How might suburbanization and the growth of shopping malls have had a negative impact on the public citizenship?

Similar questions: suburbanization growth shopping malls negative impact public citizenship.

Now, quit texting your friends and crack the books! .

Now, quit texting your friends and crack the books!

2 Hmm. You'll have to decide about this one. The question seems to be implying that people moving to the suburbs are bad.

I'm not too sure about that premise unless, in the context of your other questions, it may be talking about white flight from the cities while minorities moved into urban centers. Some cities are crippled from being overburdened by the poor and unemployed, others are doing OK.

Hmm. You'll have to decide about this one. The question seems to be implying that people moving to the suburbs are bad.

I'm not too sure about that premise unless, in the context of your other questions, it may be talking about white flight from the cities while minorities moved into urban centers. Some cities are crippled from being overburdened by the poor and unemployed, others are doing OK.

They aren't learning a thing that way. Are you bound and determined that we're going to have a nation of lazy, shiftless, brain dead types who are incapable of doing anything for themselves? You should be ashamed of yourself!

.

They aren't learning a thing that way. Are you bound and determined that we're going to have a nation of lazy, shiftless, brain dead types who are incapable of doing anything for themselves? You should be ashamed of yourself!

Plasticmakem replied to post #2: 4 No, DZ totally the wrong end of the stick. A raise in malls with the higher transit times and total shopping experience, means that those people who actually learnt there stuff at school, would have less time to do the home work of others who spent their time shopping in the malls. One might look at the paradigm that looks at the relative disposable income of those that worked and those that didn't at school.

No, DZ totally the wrong end of the stick. A raise in malls with the higher transit times and total shopping experience, means that those people who actually learnt there stuff at school, would have less time to do the home work of others who spent their time shopping in the malls. One might look at the paradigm that looks at the relative disposable income of those that worked and those that didn't at school.

MrItty replied to post #3: 5 I think it's job security. The more unqualified college graduates entering the work force, the less likely our current employers can lay us off and replace us with cheaper labor. Not a bad approach, when you think about it.

This user has been banned from Askville.

MrItty replied to post #3: 5 I think it's job security. The more unqualified college graduates entering the work force, the less likely our current employers can lay us off and replace us with cheaper labor. Not a bad approach, when you think about it.

I think it's job security. The more unqualified college graduates entering the work force, the less likely our current employers can lay us off and replace us with cheaper labor. Not a bad approach, when you think about it.

I cant really gove you an answer,but what I can give you is a way to a solution, that is you have to find the anglde that you relate to or peaks your interest. A good paper is one that people get drawn into because it reaches them ln some way.As for me WW11 to me, I think of the holocaust and the effect it had on the survivors, their families and those who stood by and did nothing until it was too late.